Permalink

0

Aus unseren Neuerwerbungen – Anglistik 2019.2

Buchcover

The func­tions of „gen­er­al nouns“: the­o­ry and cor­pus analy­sis
The author crit­i­cal­ly dis­cuss­es the con­cept of ‹gen­er­al nouns›, which Halliday/Hasan intro­duced in their approach to lex­i­cal cohe­sion (1976), and she pro­vides a com­pre­hen­sive overview of these nouns from a micro- and a macro-lin­guis­tic per­spec­tive. For the empir­i­cal analy­sis, the author com­piled a cor­pus, which allows state­ments about a medi­um- and genre-spe­cif­ic use of ‹gen­er­al nouns›. For this pur­pose, she devel­oped an ana­lyt­i­cal tool, which takes into account for­mal and seman­tic fea­tures. The major out­come of the cor­pus analy­sis is that ‹gen­er­al nouns› are much more flex­i­ble in form and func­tion than Halliday/Hasan assumed and, most impor­tant­ly, that they ful­fil genre-spe­cif­ic func­tions some of which have not sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly been asso­ci­at­ed with lex­i­cal cohe­sion.
zum Buch im ULB-Kat­a­log
zum Buch auf der Ver­lags-Web­site

Buchcover

Read­ing smell in eigh­teenth-cen­tu­ry fic­tion
Scent is both an essen­tial and seem­ing­ly impos­si­ble-to-recov­er aspect of mate­r­i­al cul­ture. Scent is one of our strongest ties to mem­o­ry, yet to remem­ber a smell with­out exter­nal stim­uli is almost impos­si­ble for most peo­ple. More­over, human beings‘ (specif­i­cal­ly West­ern humans) abil­i­ty to smell has been dimin­ished through a process of increased empha­sis on odor-removal, hygien­ic prac­tices that empha­size de-odor­iza­tion (rather than the cov­er­ing of one odor by another).While oth­er intan­gi­bles of the human expe­ri­ence have been placed into the con­text of the eigh­teenth-cen­tu­ry nov­el, scent has so far remained large­ly side­lined in favor of dis­cus­sions of the visu­al, the aur­al, touch, and taste. The past decade has seen a great expan­sion of our under­stand­ing of how smell works phys­i­o­log­i­cal­ly, psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly, and cul­tur­al­ly, and there is no bet­ter moment than now to attempt to recov­er the traces of olfac­to­ry per­cep­tions, descrip­tions, and assump­tions.
Read­ing Smell pro­vides mod­els for how to incor­po­rate olfac­to­ry knowl­edge into new read­ings of the lit­er­ary form cen­tral to our under­stand­ing of the eigh­teenth cen­tu­ry and moder­ni­ty in gen­er­al: the nov­el. The mul­ti­pli­ca­tion and devel­op­ment of the nov­el over­laps strik­ing­ly with changes in per­son­al and pri­vate hygien­ic prac­tices that would alter the culture’s rela­tion­ship to smell. This book exam­ines how far the nov­el can be under­stood through a rein­tro­duc­tion of olfac­to­ry infor­ma­tion. After decades of read­ing for all kinds of racial, cul­tur­al, gen­dered, and oth­er sorts of absences back into the nov­el, this book takes one step fur­ther: to con­sid­er how the recov­ery of for­got­ten or over­looked olfac­to­ry assump­tions might reshape our under­stand­ing of these texts. Read­ing Smell includes wide-scale research and focused case stud­ies of some of the most strik­ing or preva­lent uses of olfac­to­ry lan­guage in eigh­teenth-cen­tu­ry British prose fic­tion. High­light­ing scents with shift­ing mean­ings across the peri­od: bod­ies, tobac­co, smelling-bot­tles, and sul­fur, Read­ing Smell not only pro­vides new insights into canon­i­cal works by authors like Swift, Smol­lett, Richard­son, Bur­ney, Austen, and Lewis, but also sheds new light on the his­to­ry of the British nov­el as a whole.
zum Buch im ULB-Kat­a­log
zum Buch auf der Ver­lags-Web­site

Weit­ere Titel kön­nen Sie in unseren Neuer­wer­bungslis­ten für die Anglis­tik ent­deck­en!

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Pflichtfelder sind mit * markiert.